<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Leadership by Design: Intersection of Art and Science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://people-equation.com/leadership-by-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://people-equation.com/leadership-by-design/</link>
	<description>Musings on mastering the people equation by Jennifer V. Miller</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:34:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheStrategicLeader</title>
		<link>http://people-equation.com/leadership-by-design/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>TheStrategicLeader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people-equation.com/?p=594#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Jennifer - great image
Matt - great ppt
Dave - great perspective
Dan - great support
StrategicLeader - adds the image could be conceived as the hard skills and the soft skills - the ying and yang - my notion is that the hard skills are useful in developing strategic intent - soft skills are useful in creating the future, maneuvering to make it happen, and executing to make sure it does happen.  

loved the string!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer &#8211; great image<br />
Matt &#8211; great ppt<br />
Dave &#8211; great perspective<br />
Dan &#8211; great support<br />
StrategicLeader &#8211; adds the image could be conceived as the hard skills and the soft skills &#8211; the ying and yang &#8211; my notion is that the hard skills are useful in developing strategic intent &#8211; soft skills are useful in creating the future, maneuvering to make it happen, and executing to make sure it does happen.  </p>
<p>loved the string!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan McCarthy</title>
		<link>http://people-equation.com/leadership-by-design/comment-page-1/#comment-840</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan McCarthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 01:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people-equation.com/?p=594#comment-840</guid>
		<description>Jennifer - 
I like your senior leadership program design model, and I think Dave described it very well.

Maybe add a little luck too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer &#8211;<br />
I like your senior leadership program design model, and I think Dave described it very well.</p>
<p>Maybe add a little luck too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brand</title>
		<link>http://people-equation.com/leadership-by-design/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people-equation.com/?p=594#comment-837</guid>
		<description>Jennifer,

I think there is an overlap between Art and Science. In some respect the element they share is creativity.  Creativity in Art is obvious.  Creativity in Science comes in the flavors of looking for solutions to unlock a mystery or seeking to discover something previously unknown, etc. Learning in Art and Science benefits from exploration.

Art requires practice; Science requires diligence. Art is experiential; Science is experimental.  

When it comes to Leadership Development some things are best learned from study (perhaps the Science side of things) and some things are best learned through experience (perhaps the Art side of the equation.  But in a holistic sense Leadership is a complex topic and there is an affiliation between leadership and management that enters into the picture as well.

So thanks for sharing this perspective.  It is one that I resonate with.

Dave Brand</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer,</p>
<p>I think there is an overlap between Art and Science. In some respect the element they share is creativity.  Creativity in Art is obvious.  Creativity in Science comes in the flavors of looking for solutions to unlock a mystery or seeking to discover something previously unknown, etc. Learning in Art and Science benefits from exploration.</p>
<p>Art requires practice; Science requires diligence. Art is experiential; Science is experimental.  </p>
<p>When it comes to Leadership Development some things are best learned from study (perhaps the Science side of things) and some things are best learned through experience (perhaps the Art side of the equation.  But in a holistic sense Leadership is a complex topic and there is an affiliation between leadership and management that enters into the picture as well.</p>
<p>So thanks for sharing this perspective.  It is one that I resonate with.</p>
<p>Dave Brand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Myatt</title>
		<link>http://people-equation.com/leadership-by-design/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Myatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 17:28:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://people-equation.com/?p=594#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Hi Jennifer:

Perhaps a video look at leadership development? http://www.n2growth.com/show_video.php?videoname=Leadership_Management.flv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jennifer:</p>
<p>Perhaps a video look at leadership development? <a href="http://www.n2growth.com/show_video.php?videoname=Leadership_Management.flv" rel="nofollow">http://www.n2growth.com/show_video.php?videoname=Leadership_Management.flv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

